data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80527/80527ae171f5dbc9c9c247b1d0811ef86f1d23a7" alt=""
Here is what I walk away from after watching: Salinger was a spoiled, self-absorbed, borderline pedophile whose only great work was a thinly-veiled autobiography.
That pretty much sums up this "reclusive genius". It is my opinion that he has used his reclusiveness to his advantage in that it perpetuated a persona that would never have been available to him had he not done so.
Let me explain. I think he knew that with Catcher in the Rye he shot his proverbial wad. There was one book inside him because he WAS Holden Caulfield. There wasn't anything else. There was perhaps a great desire for something else, but all he could manage was incident-after-accident of the Glass family. He continued to write short stories after the book was published, and a number of them were rejected. Now, what does that tell you?
He had one good story - his own. He was born to and raised in privilege. He went to private schools until his father decided that he needed more structure and discipline, and was sent to Valley Forge Military Academy. Holden was tall for his age, and if you have ever seen a photo of Salinger, you know that he was long and lean. Holden makes an appearance in another work that indicates he is lost in action during the war. Salinger's time during the war took an enormous toll on him, perhaps making him feel as if the young boy had been lost, with another one emerging after the liberation of concentration camps.
It all parallels very nicely. Does he look like a recluse to you? Not when it came to young, hot girls.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c37d4/c37d4af4e8885af33767377670ee90938c44f14d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0395b/0395b99e13a86714189737a702e0a55b8db5bd1d" alt=""
Aside from his questionable taste in the age of his love interests, he was smart enough to work the media. Surely he made the decision to become a "recluse" to those who sought him for his work. He had nothing to give. For those whom he thought may interest him, entertain him, or allow him to show his obvious disdain, he was readily available.
Great writer? Questionable.
Teaser of media? Sure.
Master manipulator? Definitely.
On my reading list? Nope.
No comments:
Post a Comment